I just came across an older article from the Journal of Recreational Mathematics about the 3x3 Magic square that reminded me of some beautiful relations in the square, and showed me a few I had never seen. The article is by Owen O'Shea and is titled "SOME WORDS ON THE LO SHU". If you want to search out the whole thing (well worth the read) it is in Volume 35(1) starting on page 23.

The Lo Shu Square (

*literally: Luo (River) Book/Scroll*) is the unique normal magic square of order three. Except for rotations or reflections it is the only order three magic square that can be formed with the digits 1-9. Chinese legends concerning the pre-historic Emperor Yu tell of the Lo Shu: In ancient China there was a huge deluge: the people offered sacrifices to the god of one of the flooding rivers, the Luo river, to try to calm his anger. A magical turtle emerged from the water with the curious and decidedly unnatural (for a turtle shell) Lo Shu pattern on its shell: circular dots giving unary (base 1) representations of the integers one through nine are arranged in a three-by-three grid. The representation in the more common Arabic Numerals looks like this:

The odd and even numbers alternate in the periphery of the Lo Shu pattern; the 4 even numbers are at the four corners, and the 5 odd numbers (outnumbering the even numbers by one) form a cross in the center of the square. The sums in each of the 3 rows, in each of the 3 columns, and in both diagonals, are all 15 (the number of days in each of the 24 cycles of the Chinese solar year.

Beyond the basics of the magic square, O'Shea points out several other interesting relations. First, the sum squares of the numbers in the top and bottom row are equal. 4

^{2}+ 9

^{2}+ 2

^{2}= 8

^{2}+ 1

^{2}+ 6

^{2}= 101. You can do the same thing with the two outside columns, 4

^{2}+ 3

^{2}+ 8

^{2}= 2

^{2}+ 7

^{2}+ 6

^{2}= 89. Go ahead, try the two diagonals, you now you are dying to know.

So what about the middle row and column? Well, the middle column is special; Because north is placed at the bottom of maps in China, the 3x3 magic square having number 1 at the bottom and 9 at the top is used in preference to the other rotations/reflections. As seen in the "Later Heaven" arrangement, 1 and 9 correspond with ☵ Kǎn 水 "Water" and ☲ Lí 火 "Fire" respectively. In the "Early Heaven" arrangement, they would correspond with ☷ Kūn 地 "Earth" and ☰ Qián 天 "Heaven" respectively. The 951 does have a nice numerical representation in the number. If you read the rows or columns as three digit numbers, you might notice that 492 – 357 + 816 = 951 and that 294 – 753 + 618 = 159. Kind of a transition from Heaven to Earth and back again.

An original O'Shea contribution is his discovery that, "Ignoring the middle column, form two-digit numbers with the other columns as follows: 42 + 37 + 86. These numbers sum to 165. Their sum of their

reversals, 68 + 73 + 24, is also 165. The same is true of 84 + 19 + 62 and their reversals, 26 + 91 + 48. Curiously, the sum of the squares of the odd digits, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, also equals 165."

If we go back to considering the rows as a three digit number, the square of each row numeral is the same as the square of their reversal: 492

^{2}+ 357

^{2}+ 816

^{2}= 618

^{2}+ 753

^{2}+ 294

^{2}. Of course that would be

*really*impressive if it worked with the columns too... I mean, awesome impressive... ahh go on, try it.

The article goes on with several dozen interesting numerical relations, and if that's your thing, you should seek it out. I'll leave you with one last beauty:

There is a not too well know problem in math called the Tarry-Escott problem which asks if there are sets of integers with the same order (same number in each set) so that the integers in each set have the same sum, the same sum of squares, etc.up to and including the same sum of kth powers.

Remarkably, the pattern in the lo shu gives a solution to the Tarry-Escott problem. Starting at the top left and reading around the outside you get the four three digit numbers, 492 ,276 , 618 , 834 . Now read them going the other way round, 438, 816, 672, 294. Now add up the numbers in each set. Add up their squares..... their cubes?

Historically, The magic squares appeared first in China. In 500

BCE, and 300 BCE, the river map is mentioned, but no explicit magic

square is given. In 80 AD Ta Tai Li Chi gives the first clear reference to a

magic square. In 570 AD Shuzun gives an actual description of a magic

square of 3. Not until 1275 do we hear of the Chinese making squares of

order larger than 3. *Mark Swaney

India seems to have developed magic squares, favoring 4x4 squares, as early as the first century AD. Larger 5x5 and 6x6 first appeared in Islamic works in the 10th century.

Fran Swetz in his Legacy of the Lo Shu, mentions Tibet and Japan in a section on "Who else Knew Aboutn Magic Squares. And in the section on "Who didn't Know About Magic Squares" he lists Babylonia, Egypt and Greece.

Magic squares came first to Western Europe around the niddle of the 15th Century. Luca Paccioli, in particular had a collection of magic squares and expanded on the work of Ahmid al-Buni of Algeria, who wrote many mystical writings in the 12th and 13th Centuries. He was also a talented mathematician.

## 1 comment:

It's the tetragrammaton/metatron cube...flower of life....fracto or fractal dimensions...Ouroboros....the monolith....the matrix....the univers....Mandelbrot set/formula.

Never knew about the magic scare.

Thks

Post a Comment