Imaginary Numbers The word imaginary was first applied to the square root of a negative number by Rene Descartes around 1635. He wrote that although one can imagine every Nth degree equation had N roots, there were no real numbers for some of those imagined roots.
Leibniz wrote, "[...neither the true roots nor the false are always real; sometimes they are, however, imaginary; namely, whereas we can always imagine as many roots for each equation as I have predicted, there is still not always a quantity which corresponds to each root so imagined. Thus, while we may think of the equation x^3−6x^2+13x−10=0 as having three roots, yet there is just one real root, which is 2, and the other two, however, increased, diminished, or multiplied them as we just laid down, remain always imaginary.] (page 380)
Around 1685 the English mathematician John Wallis wrote, "We have had occasion to make mention of Negative squares and Imaginary roots".
Some mathematicians have suggested the name be changed to avoid the stigma that it seems to create in young students, "Why do we have to learn them if they aren't even real." (To be honest, in thirty years as an educator, I never heard the question.) Perhaps the weight of history is too much to support the change.
Cardin also left a seed to inspire future work int he mystery of roots of negative numbers. Cardin had published a method of finding soltuons to certain types of cubic functions of the form \$ x^3 + ax + b \$ . His solution required finding the roots of a derived equation. For functions in which the value was negative, his method would not work, even if one of the three roots was a known real solution.
About thirty years later Rafael Bombelli found a way to use the approach to find a root to \$ x^3 - 15x -4 \$ with the known solution of four. He went on to develop a set of operations for these roots of negative numbers. By the eighteenth century the imaginary numbers were being used widely in applied mathematics and then in the nineteenth century mathematicians set about formalizing the imaginary number so that they were mathematically "real."
No comments:
Post a Comment